Sophie Graham photographs part of the site

Image tagging has long been one of the least efficient areas of our workflow. In previous years, photos of the site during excavation were taken with digital cameras. At the end of the day the trench supervisors were expected to upload the digital images to a computer, rename the files and add captions to the photos’ metadata with Adobe Bridge, and store them on the server. In the best of circumstances this meant that an image taken early in the morning would be tagged 9-10 hours later, likely after numerous other photos had been taken. To make things worse, as the season progressed and the trench supervisors became busier they tended to defer these tagging processes for a day or two. By that time they often had difficulty remembering exactly what was intended by the photo—even for archaeologists, it is sometimes hard to tell the difference between two photos of dirt.

This year we decided to move the captioning process out into the field. One of the key pieces of technology that enabled this was the Eye-Fi Connect X2, a camera memory card with built-in Wi-Fi. This card allowed us to continue to use dedicated digital cameras, which currently produce images of a much higher quality than the cameras built into many tablets and mobile devices, and to operate away from existing Wi-Fi networks. Using Eye-Fi’s Direct Mode we paired each card/camera with one iPad. After a photo is taken the card automatically broadcasts a Wi-Fi network to which the iPad connects. The card then transfers images to the iPad, putting the photos directly into the Camera Roll. The Eye-Fi app on the iPad does the actual transfer, but it can run in the background. The entire process takes from 30 seconds to a couple of minutes, depending on the number of photos.

Read the rest of this entry »

Colleen Morgan at Middle Savagery has started a discussion on the prolific use of “industry standard” commercial software without prolific licensing.

Her exact question is:

Is it ethical to use pirated software for archaeological work? Why or why not?

I don’t want to hijack that discussion here, but I want to call attention to it to see more comments.

Before I go too far into the details of our systems, I think it would be beneficial to lay out the SVP’s operating environment in order to provide a fuller picture of the context in which our systems are being employed.

(Warning: if you don’t get excited by dry discussions of infrastructure, you probably shouldn’t read this.)

Physical environment

As a regional project, the SVP does not excavate at a single site. Instead, we move from site to site depending on the amount of time required to do a proper investigation at a particular spot. We also employ survey and various other methods of data collection. This means that our infrastructure needs to be mobile and flexible, and we cannot count on having access to anything other than what we bring with us into the field. Among other things, this means all field equipment has to run on batteries and stay useable for at least 6 hours before needing to be recharged. Cellular 3G coverage in the area is also quite spotty (despite the fact that there are several large telecommunications towers on top of the mountain where we do most of our work…go figure), so internet access is assumed not to exist. We do have a pretty stable and consistent headquarters in the largest nearby town, Tornareccio, where the local Comune has been kind enough to allow us the use of one or two public buildings.

This year our lab and network setup was greatly constrained by the space that we were given. The main lab area consisted of three rooms slightly larger than your average dorm room. The first was for pottery processing, the second was the computer lab, and the third was for small finds processing. There was space outside for washing pottery and processing environmental samples. At the other end of the building was the photography lab, several hundred feet away.

Technology

The project operated on a local network, with both wired and wireless access. The only spot with internet access was at the other end of the building (out of Wi-Fi range, and with too many doors in between to run cables), and it was not connected in any way to our local network. Likewise, since the photography lab was at the other end of the building it was not connected to our local network. While this was not ideal, we decided that the other specialists had a greater need for constant access to the database, so they got assigned the two rooms next to the computer lab.

The major equipment we used is listed below. All Macs (except the server) have Boot Camp partitions for ArcGIS and other Windows-only software.

Hardware:

  • 1 Mac Mini Server (network management, local file server, sharing the FileMaker Pro database over the network, and iTunes syncing for iPads)
  • 1 moderately recent Windows server (legacy data from previous seasons)
  • A handful of MacBook Pros of various ages (image processing, GIS, and multipurpose)
  • 1 Mac Mini (GIS and multipurpose)
  • 2 older Gateway laptops (finds and pottery specialists)
  • 6 iPad WiFi 16GB
  • 1 iPad WiFi + 3G 32GB
  • 2 Trimble handheld GPS units
  • A handful of point-and-shoot cameras of various ages
  • 1 Canon DSLR
  • 2 Eye-Fi Connect X2 cards
  • Various networking and other equipment

Software:

  • FileMaker Pro (and Pro Advanced) 11
  • ArcGIS 10
  • Adobe CS5
  • Adobe Lightroom 3

The recent death of Apple Co-founder Steve Jobs has caused me to reflect a little on the man and his company’s impact on us as classicists and archaeologists.

Jobs once said: “Using a computer is like riding a bicycle. It gets you to and from places with great speed and efficiency; it’s like getting wheels for the mind.” This turned into an international marketing campaign right around the introduction of the Macintosh. An early ad featured John Cherry’s academic work and highlights the ability to type in Greek and assemble materials including charts and images for publication.

After Jobs left Apple in 1985, Apple continued to support classics and academia. Apple gave several grants to the fledgling Perseus project in the form of equipment or money from 1987-1991. I vaguely remember that the office that was funding these projects quietly disappeared in the early 90s.

As an undergraduate in the early 90s I used the computer labs at UMBC which were Windows or Unix based. I typed my honor’s thesis on Thucydides in WordPerfect 4.2 for DOS, with the manual open to the four digit codes to type in for each and every Greek character. My first glimpse of a Macintosh was when our library purchased one for the Perseus CD-ROMS and the TLG hypercard stack Pandora, which came out around the same time.

When I arrived at UC as a graduate student in 1994 they had been using Macs for a decade already. The faculty and student lab machines were SEs or SE/30s. It was explained to me that the faculty had been using Macs since 1984 because it was the only computer upon which they could type Greek. Even then it wasn’t universally accepted and some of the students still printed their papers in the ‘old fashioned’ way which was to type up the paper while leaving white space for the greek, then put the pages in an IBM Selectric typewriter with a Greek typeball and type the Greek. And it was at UC, with the SuperGreek keyboard layout taped to the wall, that I learned how to touch type Greek, which was an amazing thing to be able to do.

Most of our work at Troy was unfortunately completed during the days when Apple was faltering as a company. Many of the laptops that we had purchased had some design flaws that we found irritating. The keyboards were a problem. In the models from the Powerbook 160s all the way up to the PowerBook G3 we had tremendous problems dealing with the dirt that any archaeological dig would encounter. At that time we couldn’t cover the keyboards with plastic since that is how the heat generally escaped and that would overheat the laptops. I had to replace many keyboards in those years, and the Windows laptops that some were using didn’t seem to have that problem.

After Jobs’ return to Apple, the computers got much better, especially the laptops. From the Titanium G4 to the current line of Airs and unibody MacBook Pros, the machines have been more and more pleasant to work on. I don’t think that I am alone in this opinion since I also saw greater numbers of Apple laptops at the AIA/APA annual meetings each year during this time.

But it was when the iPhone 3 came out that I knew they were onto something else. This model was introduced along with the App store, which allowed you to run non-Apple software on it. This opened up whole new possibilities. I remember sitting in my office holding it in one hand. It had a camera, GPS, and unlimited software and I said to myself “this is a perfect archaeology recording machine.” With that phone I could get rid of my hand-held GPS, my notebook, my clipboard of forms, my maps, my calculator, my camera, and much of the gear necessary for recording both surveys and excavations. It appealed to me as the perfect combination of Jobs’ simplicity and Alton Brown’s edict that you shouldn’t own any kitchen gadget that doesn’t have more than one use. But then I hadn’t predicted the iPad.

This blog wasn’t created to just show how to use iPads in archaeology, (and not necessarily tablets either) but that device has become important to the workflow of several teams. I know of one project in Italy using Android devices, but I haven’t heard about their results. If others have any leads on the use of Android in the field, I would like to know that as well. But I would like to mention here that the class of device that we are using for data recording didn’t exist a few years ago. And they exist now because of Steve Jobs. Wheels for the mind indeed.

My name is Chris Motz, and I am delighted to be the newest contributor to this blog. I will be writing a series of posts detailing the paperless workflow implemented at the Sangro Valley Project this summer, and will post updates as we revise that workflow throughout the year.

This year the Sangro Valley Project proudly joined the ranks of paperless archaeological projects, with great success. In this first post I will give an overview of our paperless initiative, and in later posts I will get into some of the more technical aspects. John’s writing has been a great help while developing our database, so I hope I can also be of some help to those creating paperless systems in the future.

The Sangro Valley Project (www.sangro.org), or SVP, was founded in 1994 and is now managed by Oberlin College in collaboration with the Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici dell’Abruzzo and the University of Oxford. The project operates a summer field school in Italy for Oberlin and other students; it employs a multi-disciplinary team of specialists from Canada, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The project’s goal is to characterize and investigate the nature, pattern and dynamics of human habitation and land use in the longue durée within the context of a Mediterranean river valley system—the Sangro River valley of the Abruzzo region of Italy, the territory of the ancient Samnites.

(Shameless plug: to get the latest news about the SVP and to see photos from this season, including our use of iPads in the field, please visit our new Facebook page.)

View from the site.

Read the rest of this entry »